What are the two valid reasons for appealing nonjudicial punishment?

The correct answer highlights that an appeal for nonjudicial punishment can be based on whether the punishment is perceived as unjust or disproportionate to the offense committed. This principle is rooted in the military's emphasis on fair treatment and due process. By allowing appeals on these grounds, the system acknowledges that not all cases will fit neatly within the expected parameters of discipline and that there can be legitimate concerns regarding the severity of the punishment in relation to the individual's actions.

When punishment is seen as unjust, it underscores the importance of ensuring that all service members are held to the same standards and that the discipline they face is consistent with their actions. A punishment considered disproportionate suggests that the response to the behavior was excessive, which can undermine morale and trust in the military justice system.

This approach fosters an environment where service members feel they can seek recourse and ensures a level of accountability within the disciplinary processes. By allowing appeals on these grounds, the military maintains the integrity of its justice system, ensuring it is fair and equitable.