Which method is NOT a detection countermeasure for mines and booby traps?

The option indicating "Listening" as a detection countermeasure for mines and booby traps is the correct choice. While listening can be a useful skill in certain contexts, it is not a widely recognized or reliable method for detecting such hazards. Mines and booby traps are typically designed to be stealthy and undetectable by auditory means, since they can be buried or camouflaged effectively to minimize sounds that might alert personnel to their presence.

In contrast, visual inspection, probing, and the use of mine detectors are all established and effective methods for detecting mines and booby traps. Visual inspection relies on observing the terrain for signs of disturbances that may indicate the presence of these hazards. Probing involves using a tool to physically check for buried explosives, which allows for a tactile assessment of the ground. Mine detectors use specialized technology to identify the metallic components within mines and booby traps, providing a crucial safety measure for personnel operating in potentially hazardous environments. Each of these methods plays an important role in ensuring the safety of personnel during reconnaissance or movement in areas suspected of containing explosive threats.